If Indonesia’s democracy is still alive, why do so many citizens feel that power is slipping into the hands of a small elite? From food estates in Papua to Danantara and the Makan Bergizi Gratis program, policies marketed as solutions to poverty, food security, and national progress are increasingly raising a deeper question: are they empowering ordinary Indonesians—or quietly strengthening oligarchic networks behind the scenes? As economic dependence, political branding, corporate influence, and environmental controversies converge, many fear that democracy is not disappearing through dictatorship, but through a slower process in which citizens become beneficiaries, elites become gatekeepers, and power becomes harder to challenge. The real battle may no longer be about elections alone, but about who truly controls Indonesia’s future.
The Dangerous Romance of “Indonesian-Style Democracy”: A Critical Reflection at 80 Years of Independence
As Indonesia approaches its 80th independence anniversary, President Prabowo Subianto's call for a unique democracy rooted in local traditions raises concerns. Critics fear this "Indonesian-style democracy" may centralize power while masking past authoritarian abuses. True democracy requires accountability, independent institutions, and recognition of the dangers posed by political elites, urging vigilance for genuine liberty.
Premanism in Indonesia: Roots, Impacts, and Solutions
Premanism in Indonesia represents more than mere criminality; it reflects deep-rooted institutional failures, such as corruption and inefficiency within state systems. Street thugs exploit weak governance by extorting local vendors and businesses, with state actors often complicit. Addressing premanism requires systemic reforms, ethical governance, and empowered civic engagement to restore justice.

